4619346536
( 04619346536 )

brignais 69530 france

Ce numéro de la région parisienne appartient aux numéros d'arnaque. Quand vous décrochez, il demande de rappeler le numéro surtaxé, ou bien il raccroche. Il semble que le numéro est jumelé avec un centre d'appel 01789064xx - seuls les deux chiffres dernieres changent.

Société Star of service, j'ai déjà eu plusieurs clients grâce à eu et je recommande ce site ! Maintenant si des gens ne sont pas d'accord, c'est leur choix mais pas le mien !

tel'a'dom 4 rue jean moulin 77280 othis france île-de-france

De fiscalisation avec la loi Pinel

Trump asks federal appeals court to reconsider its decision largely upholding gag order bs2site.at ormer President Donald Trump is asking a federal appeals court to reconsider its decision earlier this month largely upholding the gag order issued against him in his federal election subversion case. Trump, in a Monday filing to the US DC Circuit Court of Appeals, asked the three-judge panel that handled the issue to either rehear it or for the issue to be considered en banc, meaning the case would be heard by the full court. Trump’s attorneys also asked the court to temporarily freeze the gag order while it considers their request for the case to be reheard. https://bs2site-at.net bs.gl Earlier this month, the three-judge panel said in a unanimous decision that Trump can be barred from talking about witnesses as well as prosecutors, the court staff and their family members. But the court said the gag order does not apply to comments made about special counsel Jack Smith and narrowed the prohibition Trump had regarding speaking about witnesses in the case, a change from the original gag order. “The opinion holds that President Trump must be silenced to protect trial participants from possible threats or ‘harassment’ from unrelated third parties,” Trump’s attorneys wrote in the 22-page filing. “In doing so, the opinion conflicts with decisions of the Supreme Court and other Circuits, warranting en banc consideration both to secure uniformity of this Court’s decisions and because of the question’s exceptional importance,” they wrote.